Most of the time when we hear about an accident or incident involving a person driving while impacted by the effects of alcohol, we automatically make assumptions about that person. The same is true for the majority of people who are considered under the law as you peers. Since the determination of whether or not you are under the influence is left to the discretion of the enforcing officer, you absolutely must have a DUI Lawyer in California if you expect to be treated fairly.
The American culture is extremely fond of automobiles and alcohol, and yet the two are a disastrous combination. Our love affair with the car is such that mass transit systems have never really had much of a groundswell of support from any quarter. Through movies and societal behaviors, with a terrific push from some very sophisticated advertising, the use of alcohol has become a ubiquitously accepted social norm, despite the fact that we all know we make poorer decisions after drinking.
Our fervor to punish those who are driving after drinking is so intense that a person who is the victim of a sober individual who drove carelessly is more likely to be cited at the scene. It is not that officers of the law are intentionally unfair, only that their training and the political and popular climate is so impaired driver averse that they are quick to judge.
It is easy in hindsight to point to an individual that is arrested for drunk driving and conclude they made a bad decision for which they must now be punished. Looked at from an objective viewpoint however, we do not make it easy for an individuals to make the right decision, save the adage that if you have even one drink you should not drive. There is no objective way for a person leaving a restaurant or bar to assess the level of blood alcohol they have, so all they can do is ask themselves if they feel okay to drive.
We are each individual human beings, and our tolerance levels to alcohol are as unique as our fingerprints. Even the same individual will have varying responses to alcohol over time, sometimes less susceptible, sometimes more so. Then there is that field sobriety assessment, it singularly empowers the arresting officer to decide the state of sobriety of the suspect, sometimes at the suspects expense.
There is no question the public safety mandates that our highway patrol and other law enforcement officials need to do everything they can to eliminate the impact of individuals driving incapacitated. Unfortunately, the results of being cited for DUI are the same whether you just decided to pound a six pack of beer, or have taken medication for the first time and are having a bad time with its impact on your system. Medical conditions can also leave one with the appearance of inebriation.
While it does not happen often, there are instances wherein individuals undergoing a period of hypoglycemia which law enforcement has incorrectly diagnosed as drunken behavior. This is a natural result of the overwhelming pressure to eliminate drunk driving as a source of vehicular deaths. There is, of course, logic to the stance that it does not matter what is causing an individual to drive poorly, the danger to others is the same, yet justice would dictate a more reasoned response.
The bottom line is that every situation in which a driver is legally stopped and an officer makes the decision the individual is operating their motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs is unique. While the visceral reaction of the public with its quick to condemn attitude is understandable, it does not reflect the proper exercise of justice. The only way for an individual so charged to ensure their rights are protected is to retain a DUI Lawyer in California, where public outrage at unnecessary accidents as grown to a crescendo.
Injury Attorney
Accident, Advocate, attorney, california, driving, Drunk, dui, injury, Injury Attorney, Judge, law, lawyer, legal, usa